Transferred mens rea


Produced in partnership with Christopher Sykes of 33 Chancery Lane
Practice notes
In-house

Transferred mens rea


Produced in partnership with Christopher Sykes of 33 Chancery Lane

Practice notes
In-house
imgtext

The principle of transferred Malice/transferred Mens rea

The Supreme Court has stated that a better description for transferred malice might be 鈥榯ransferred mens rea鈥. The term 鈥榯ransferred malice鈥 has been described as 鈥榓 Misleading 濒补产别濒鈥.

This article will refer to the principle as 鈥榯ransferred mens rea鈥. This principle becomes relevant where a criminal intention leads to an unintended outcome or harm. It may apply provided that the outcome or harm is the same kind as intended, even if the actual victim is not the same as the intended victim.

Latimer exemplifies the basic principle. D tried to assault V with his belt. He missed V and accidentally hit V2. D was found guilty of assault despite not having intended to hit V2. This reasoning was later applied in Mitchell, in which D assaulted V causing him to fall on V2. V2 was elderly and suffered a broken bone that led to her death in hospital. D was convicted of Manslaughter despite having had no intention to assault V2. The court held that it was not

Christopher Sykes
Christopher Sykes

Barrister, 33 Chancery Lane

Christopher acts for the prosecution and defence in cases of business crime and investigations. He has been instructed by the FCA as junior and disclosure counsel in complex prosecutions. He has gained experience of investigations through his work with the Enforcement Decision Making Committee of the Bank of England and the Fraud Investigation Service of HMRC. He has been led by senior members of Chambers in defending private prosecutions for fraud and in confiscation proceedings. He has defended individuals facing allegations of civil contempt in the High Court for breach of freezing injunctions. He is panel counsel for the SFO.
听
Alongside his business crime practice, Christopher offers extensive experience and expertise in the practice area of professional discipline and regulation. He is frequently instructed by the GDC to present the case in substantive, interim, and High Court matters. He is regularly instructed to act for the defence by the CSP. Christopher gained in-house experience of regulatory enforcement through his secondment as a case presenter for the GOC.
听
Christopher brings to these roles the experience gained as a criminal advocate appearing in the magistrates鈥 courts, Crown Courts, and Court of Appeal. He has secured successful outcomes for clients facing the most serious criminal allegations, including kidnap and terrorism.
听
Christopher contributed to the drafting of 鈥淭he UK Anti-Bribery Handbook鈥 (Bloomsbury, 2022) and Blackstone鈥檚 Criminal Practice 2020.

Read moreRead more
Powered by Lexis+庐
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Malice definition
What does Malice mean?

Malice is not to be understood in terms of 鈥渨ickedness鈥 but in terms of intention to cause harm or at least actual foresight that harm may result.

Read more

Popular documents

Self-defence

Self-defenceSelf-defenceSelf-defence is an absolute defence which applies in crimes committed by force, it applies even in cases of murder. If a jury finds that a defendant was acting in self-defence, they will be acquitted. The common law defence of self-defence was incorporated into statute with

Dishonesty in the criminal law

Dishonesty in the criminal lawDishonesty provides the mens rea for multiple offences under statute and the common law. It is, however, not fully defined by statute. The exception is the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968), which goes some way towards defining dishonesty but only insofar as certain offences

Specific and basic intent

Specific and basic intentIntention refers to the outcome sought by the defendant. Offences may be described as either ones of 鈥榖asic intent鈥 or of 鈥榮pecific intent鈥. The Court of Appeal has described this distinction as 鈥榚lusive鈥. The Court nevertheless provided the following definition of specific

Transferred mens rea

Transferred mens reaThe principle of transferred malice/transferred mens reaThe Supreme Court has stated that a better description for transferred malice might be 鈥榯ransferred mens rea鈥. The term 鈥榯ransferred malice鈥 has been described as 鈥榓 misleading 濒补产别濒鈥.This article will refer to the principle