Shareholder advisory groups take a dig at Glencore鈥檚 remuneration package

Shareholder advisory groups take a dig at Glencore鈥檚 remuneration package

Shareholder advisory groups Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) have urged shareholders to reject the remuneration package proposed at Glencore鈥檚 for Gary Nagle, who is expected to take the reins from CEO Ivan Glasenberg in July.

Glasenberg, who has been CEO of Glencore for 19 years, holds a significant interest in Glencore of 9%, making him one of the company鈥檚 largest shareholders. As such, he waived his participation in any salary increase and incentive schemes, which the remuneration committee described as 鈥not typical or competitive鈥. The committee stated in its that that arrangements for the new CEO would therefore needed to be 鈥榥ewly created鈥 rather than based on these prior arrangements, to ensure a pay package which is both 鈥competitive and aligned with our shareholders鈥 interests鈥.

Nagle鈥檚 remuneration package consists of a base salary of $1.9m (拢1.4m) including pensions and benefits, compared to Glasenberg鈥檚 base rate of $1.5m (拢1.1m). When combined with the incentive plans, including the newly introduced restrictive share plan (RSP), and a 250% annual bonus opportunity (an increase from the previous 200% maximum bonus policy), Nagle鈥檚 salary could be as high as $10.4m (拢7.5m). However, the report stated that 鈥the maximum total annual remuneration that the CEO will actually receive during his employment is c. $6.4m (拢4.6m) compared to the peer maximum of $11-18m (拢7.9-12.9), since 40% is held back until two years post-employment鈥. Furthermore, the annual report highlights that 60% of the reward would be in shares.  The committee therefore state that this aligns the interest of the executive committee and shareholders, highlighting how long-term share ownership is promoted by the UK Corporate Governance Code.  The committee also emphasised that the package was based on benchmarking against its FTSE 30 competitors, including, Anglo American, BHP, BP, Rio Tinto and Shell, and that the 鈥proposed remuneration package was developed and consulted upon with a significant number of shareholders and proxy advisors鈥.

Despite this, Glass Lewis and ISS have urged shareholders to reject the remuneration policy and RSP. Glass Lewis stated that the package was 鈥榚xcessive for a newly appointed CEO with no previous experience running a publicly listed company鈥. ISS echoed this sentiment, highlighting that the RSP meant a large portion of the package was 鈥榥on-performance related鈥 and further stating the pay was 鈥榟igh relative to peers鈥 despite Glencore claiming it was based on benchmarking against its competitors. Notably, the Investment Association (IA) stated within its that, when setting base salary, these decisions should not be based solely on comparisons against peer companies, as 鈥榯he constant chasing of the median has been a major contributor to the spiralling levels of pay鈥. The IA have issued a red top warning over the policy.

The remuneration policy is not the only thing that came under fire, with Glass Lewis also calling on shareholders to reject Glencore鈥檚 proposed resolution 鈥楥limate Action Transition Plan鈥.  Glencore鈥檚 climate strategy, as announced in December 2020, sets out plans to become a net-zero emissions company by 2050, in line with the Paris Agreement.  In line with this, the board intends to put forward a new climate plan every three years, which would subsequently be put forward to a shareholder advisory vote at the AGM, similarly to how voting on remuneration policy works.  However, Glass Lewis stated that this would allow the board to delegate its responsibility for setting corporate strategy, as shareholders would be able to direct climate strategy through their votes.

Glencore鈥檚 climate strategy announcement follows on from issues that were raised in its last AGM season, where  advisory groups including PIRC and The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility urged shareholders to vote against the re-election of non-executive director, Peter Coates, who chairs the health, safety, environment & communities committee, after his controversial views on climate change. This includes stating that the climate change debate had become 鈥榠llogical鈥. Furthermore, PIRC urged shareholders to vote against the election of chair, Tony Hayward, due to concerns over his track record and tenure. Hayward was CEO of BP during the devasting oil rig explosion in 2010. Glass Lewis, however, supported all resolutions proposed by Glencore in its 2020 AGM, and no resolution proposed received any significant no votes.  Both Coates and Hayward remain on the board.

Glencore鈥檚 2021 AGM is expected to be held on 29 April 2021.

 


Related Articles:
Latest Articles:
About the author:

Market Tracker is a unique service for corporate lawyers housed within Lexis庐PSL Corporate. It features a powerful transaction data analysis tool for accessing, analysing and comparing the specific features of corporate transactions, with a comprehensive and searchable library of deal documentation across 14 different deal types. The Market Tracker product also includes news and analysis of key corporate deals and activity and in-depth analysis of recent trends in corporate transactions.聽