"Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that 桔子视频 provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use 桔子视频."
KaurMaxwell
Access all documents on Conspiracy
An agreement between two or more persons to commit an offence, or which necessarily involves committing an offence, or which falls within the ambit of 鈥conspiracy to defraud鈥 or 鈥渃onspiracy to corrupt public morals/outrage public decency鈥.
The offence of common law conspiracy is committed where two or more persons agree: (i) to defraud, whether or not the fraud amounts to a crime or even a tort; (ii) to do an act which tends to corrupt public morals or outrage public decency, whether or not this amounts to a crime, but only where the agreement would not amount to or involve the commission of an offence if carried out by a single person otherwise than in pursuance of an agreement (in which case it can be charged a statutory conspiracy).
The offence of statutory conspiracy is committed where two or more persons agree to pursue a course of conduct which, if carried out in accordance with their intentions, will necessarily amount to or involve the commission of any offence(s) by one or more of the conspirators, or would do so but for the existence of facts which
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business鈥揳ll whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
What to think about before bringing a private competition action鈥攃hecklist Is there an actionable claim? Note: private competition actions remain largely regulated by national law and procedural and substantive rules across the EU may vary significantly, therefore assessments in individual jurisdictions will need to be made when planning competition litigation. Possible causes of action 鈥 Consider if there is an infringement of UK competition law (or EU competition law prior to the end of the Brexit transition period). 鈼 Consider whether the loss suffered can be attributed to an agreement or concerted action between undertakings, especially competing undertakings (see further, The prohibition on restrictive agreements). 鈼 Consider whether the loss might have been caused by an entity that is arguably dominant typically with a large share of a relevant market, and could be said to have abused its dominance contrary to Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998 (and/or Article 102 TFEU if prior to the end of the Brexit transition period) (see further, The prohibition on abuse of dominance)....
Sentencing Guidelines for Corporate offenders鈥擣raud or VAT offences checklist This Checklist summarises the Sentencing Council鈥檚 guidelines for sentencing corporate offences of fraud under the Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006), Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968), Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994) and Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (CEMA 1979) in the Crown Court and magistrates鈥 court. The Fraud Guidelines for corporate offenders can be accessed here: 鈥 Magistrates鈥 Court Sentencing Guideline鈥擟orporate offenders: fraud, bribery and money laundering鈥攆or use in cases involving corporates being sentenced in the magistrates鈥 court 鈥 Crown Court Sentencing Guideline鈥擟orporate offenders: fraud, bribery and money laundering鈥攆or use in cases involving corporates being sentenced in the Crown Court The Sentencing Council also publishes a number of overarching guidelines, which should be considered in respect of all sentencing exercises. This includes: 鈥 Totality guideline (Crown Court) 鈥 Totality guideline (magistrates鈥 court) 鈥 General guideline鈥攐verarching principles (Crown Court) 鈥 General guideline鈥攐verarching principles (magistrates鈥 court) 鈥 Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea (Crown Court) 鈥 Reduction in...
Discover our 2 Checklists on Conspiracy
There are three main inchoate offences in English law: 鈥onspiracy鈥攚here at least two people have agreed to commit a crime鈥ttempt鈥攚here the defendant has tried to commit the offence and has got relatively close to achieving the objective (see Practice Note: Attempt), and鈥ncouraging or assisting a crime (formerly incitement)鈥攚here the defendant must have encouraged or assisted another to commit a crime (see Practice Note: Encouraging and assisting criminality)An inchoate offence is one that is incomplete. Such offences are committed where the defendant takes certain steps towards the commission of a crime, but the actions fall short of the consummated crime. The exception to this is conspiracy to defraud, where the result to be achieved does not need to be a crime. This particular offence is dealt with in a separate Practice Note: Conspiracy to defraud. Inchoate offences cannot be charged on their own, ie there is no charge of conspiracy or attempt. There must be a substantive offence and the indictment must be drafted with reference to the complete offence, eg...
Offence of conspiracy to defraudConspiracy to defraud is a common law offence which was expressly preserved by section 5(2) of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (CLA 1977) and is triable only on indictment.The offence requires that two or more individuals dishonestly conspire to commit a fraud against a victim. It is a very wide offence and catches conduct that might not constitute an offence but which, by reason of two or more people agreeing to do it with the requisite intent, it becomes an offence.Common law conspiracy is therefore wider than statutory conspiracy because it does not require the agreement to be in respect of the commission of a substantive criminal offence.The statutory offence of聽conspiracy is found in CLA 1977, s 1. The statutory offence requires a conspiracy that will necessarily amount to or involve the commission of an offence by one or more of the parties to the agreement, or would do so, but for the existence of facts that render the commission of the offence or any of...
Discover our 21 Practice Notes on Conspiracy
Corporate criminal liability鈥攃ode of ethics 1 Introduction 1.1 [Insert organisation name] takes great pride in the way we conduct our business. Our Code of ethics embodies the standards and policies under which we operate. It applies to us all. Please take care to read the Code, understand it, and use it to guide you in your work. If you have any questions about the Code and its application, you should speak with [insert, eg your manager]. 1.2 [Insert organisation name] has a zero tolerance towards employees committing criminal acts. 1.3 From 26 December 2023, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 provides that where a senior manager, acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, commits a relevant offence, the organisation is also guilty of the offence. 2 Senior manager 2.1 A senior manager is someone who plays a significant role in: 2.1.1 making decisions about how the whole or a substantial part of the activities of the organisation are to be managed or organised, or 2.1.2...
Corporate criminal liability board briefing Date: [insert date] 1 Introduction The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) is intended to strengthen the UK鈥檚 fight against economic crime. One of the most significant elements of the ECCTA 2023 for commercial organisations is the expansion of corporate criminal liability for the actions of senior managers. 1.1 What鈥檚 the issue? The identification doctrine, established by the courts in 1971, is the legal test for deciding whether the actions and mind of a natural person can be regarded as those of a legal person. It is the main way in which criminal liability has been attributed to corporate entities. The doctrine requires that an offence must be committed by the 鈥榙irecting mind and will鈥 of a corporation to trigger attribution to the corporate itself. In practice, this was limited to the managing director or owner where they were also involved in the running of the company. This has always been a high bar for prosecutors, which the government has now significantly...
Dive into our 3 Precedents related to Conspiracy
Law360, London: Counsel for far-right activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon urged the Court of Appeal on 11 April 2025 to reduce his 18-month sentence for contempt of court, arguing that prison conditions have caused a 'demonstrable effect' on his mental health.
A round-up of the latest trading standards prosecutions, including four men sentenced for selling counterfeit designer clothing and accessories
Read the latest 7 News articles on Conspiracy
**Trials are provided to all 桔子视频 content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these 桔子视频 services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234