"A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful."
1 High Pavement
Access all documents on Limitation period
The time period during which court action must begin.
In England and Wales, the limitation period for an action on a simple contract is six years from the date the cause of action accrued; for an action on a specialty (deed) the period is twelve years. For personal injury claims, the limitation period is three years.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
What to think about before bringing a private competition action—checklist Is there an actionable claim? Note: private competition actions remain largely regulated by national law and procedural and substantive rules across the EU may vary significantly, therefore assessments in individual jurisdictions will need to be made when planning competition litigation. Possible causes of action • Consider if there is an infringement of UK competition law (or EU competition law prior to the end of the Brexit transition period). ◦ Consider whether the loss suffered can be attributed to an agreement or concerted action between undertakings, especially competing undertakings (see further, The prohibition on restrictive agreements). ◦ Consider whether the loss might have been caused by an entity that is arguably dominant typically with a large share of a relevant market, and could be said to have abused its dominance contrary to Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998 (and/or Article 102 TFEU if prior to the end of the Brexit transition period) (see further, The prohibition on abuse of dominance)....
Procedural guide—Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (civil remedy) The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA 1997) makes it an offence to pursue a course of conduct that amounts to harassment and creates a civil tort allowing for a claim for damages and ancillary injunctions. The High Court and county court can grant an injunction for personal protection by forbidding harassment. Where clients are unable to avail themselves of the provisions of the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) because they do not satisfy the criteria or eligibility, or where damages are sought, then their solution may lie under the PHA 1997. Claims under the PHA 1997 are not 'family proceedings' and applications are governed by the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, SI 1998/3132 (CPR). Criteria The relevant legislative provisions are contained in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. PHA 1997 Harassment is any course of conduct which might be seen by a reasonable person to amount to harassment. The victim of a course of conduct prohibited by PHA 1997, s...
Discover our 2 Checklists on Limitation period
The principal limitation periodsThe following table includes the principal types of action and details the number of years within which such a claim can be brought under the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), noting relevant statutory provisions and authorities as appropriate.Note that the table is not exhaustive. It focuses on the actions that are most likely to be of interest to a dispute resolution practitioner and does not cover certain very specific claims, for example subsequent conversions of goods (LA 1980, s 3), although these are set out in the LA 1980.For further information on certain types of claims, see Practice Notes:•Limitation—contract claims•Limitation—tort claims•Limitation—professional negligence claims•Limitation—constructive trust claims•Limitation periods in construction contracts•Time limits under the Limitation Act 1980—personal injury claims•Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocol•Limitation periods in arbitration (England & Wales)See also Practice Notes:•Limitation Act 1980—general application, for guidance on how to determine a limitation period (ie when time runs from and when time stops running), and•Limitation—extensions of time under the Limitation Act 1980, Limitation—latent damage and Limitation—fraud, deliberate...
This Practice Note addresses the issues arising out of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) in relation to tort claims. It looks at limitation periods for actions founded on tort, with particular focus on joint tortfeasors, concurrent duties between contract and tort claims, contingent damage, continuing wrongs and latent damage.For more general guidance concerning limitation, see: Limitation—overview and Practice Notes:•Limitation Act 1980—general application•Limitation—the principal limitation periodsInitial considerationsA tort consists of ‘a breach of duty which gives a private law right to the party injured to recover compensatory damages at common law from the party causing the injury’ (SAAMCO). In the event that you have an action founded on a tort, the limitation period will be six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued (LA 1980, s 2).Note that the terms of LA 1980, s 2 are widely drawn and capable of applying to new rights, which are most likely to be statutory claims that the courts classify as a tort. In Factortame (No 7) it was...
Discover our 24 Practice Notes on Limitation period
Letter of claim for negligently performed surgery Dear [insert organisation name] Letter of Claim [insert claimant’s name] v [insert defendant’s name] We have been instructed to act on behalf of [insert claimant’s name] in relation to treatment carried out/care provided at [insert name of defendant hospital] by [insert name(s) of surgeon(s) if known] on or around [insert date(s)]. Please let us know if you do not believe that you are the appropriate defendant or if you are aware of any other potential defendants. This letter is sent pursuant to the Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes. You should acknowledge receipt of this letter in writing and identify who will be dealing with this matter within 14 days. Failure to acknowledge receipt may result in the Claimant issuing proceedings without further reference to you. Further within four months of receipt of this letter you should provide a Letter of Response setting out whether the claim is admitted or denied and provide copies of any...
Reliance agreement This Agreement is made on the [insert date] day of [insert month] 20[insert year] Parties 1 [insert name of party], a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address] (Consultant); and 2 [insert name of party], a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address] (Beneficiary). Background (A) The Consultant was engaged by [insert name] (Client) to carry out the Services at the Property and prepare the Report[s] (B) The Beneficiary is [insert beneficiary’s connection with the Property] and seeks to rely on the Report[s] The parties agree: 1 [insert details] 2 Definitions and interpretation 2.1 In this Agreement, unless otherwise provided: Report[s] • mean[s] [insert name of environmental report/s] [insert reference] prepared for [insert client name] [insert date] Property • means [insert address] Services • means [insert description of Consultant’s services] 2.2 References to the Consultant and the Beneficiary shall include their respective successors in title....
Dive into our 12 Precedents related to Limitation period
Can a contracting authority change the procedure adopted for a public procurement exercise (eg from open to negotiated procedure) once the procurement process has started? In conducting our research we have focussed on above-threshold procurement exercises regulated by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, SI 2015/102 (PCR 2015). As a general rule, contracting authorities conducting a public procurement exercise must adhere to the rules of the procedure that have been indicated/advertised in the Official Journal of the EU (OJEU) contract notice. Subject to the comments below, this means that it is not possible to negotiate with tenderers in, for example, an open or restricted procedure tender process. In particular, the Court of Justice made clear in SAG ELV Slovensko that: ‘the principle of equal treatment of tenderers and the obligation of transparency resulting therefrom preclude, in [the restricted] procedure, any negotiation between the contracting authority and one or other of the tenderers’. For background reading, see Practice Notes: The legal framework and general principles of EU public...
Can a landlord claim adverse possession of a plot of land in relation to their property if it has been tenanted for the duration of their ownership? Section 15 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) imposes a limitation period of 12 years on the legal owner of land from seeking to recover it from a person who is in adverse possession of it. If that period passes without the land owner seeking to recover the land by action, the legal owner’s title will be extinguished. LA 1980, s 15 still applies in relation to unregistered land but not in relation to registered land. The register is the basis of title to registered land and so there is far less justification for the limitation period set out. The Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002) changed the law in respect of adverse possession of registered land. Ignoring for the current purposes the transitional provisions, an adverse possessor of registered land can, after ten years adverse possession, apply...
See the 3 Q&As about Limitation period
PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: Can a motor insurer sued directly under the European Communities (Rights Against Insurers) Regulations 2002 (2002 Regulations) bring a Part 20 claim in its own name pursuant to the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978? The potential additional party argued not. Written by Jamie Clarke, barrister at Crown Office Chambers.
Commercial analysis: A case brought to the Court of Appeal challenging the High Court’s decision on the scope of fiduciary duty, informed consent and dishonesty. The court clarified that agents must fully disclose commissions (including the amount and method of funding) to avoid breaching fiduciary duties. Engie Power could only be liable as an accessory if dishonest and the court found the limitation period began when commission was paid, not when the contract was signed. The appeal was allowed in part. Written by Alexander Whatley, barrister at 3PB Chambers.
Read the latest 3 News articles on Limitation period
**Trials are provided to all ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234