This week's edition of Energy weekly highlights includes: a case analysis on HMRC v Royal Bank of Canada [2025] UKSC 2, in which the Supreme Court held that Article 6 of the UK-Canada double tax treaty (DTT) did not grant the UK taxation rights over certain oil-related payments. In addition, this week, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) opened the first application window for the Clean Industry Bonus (CIB) scheme, and Ofgem published its ‘minded to’ decisions on the proposed TMO4+ grid connections reform package alongside launching a further consultation, ahead of its final decision on the reforms.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE
To read the full news article, register for a free Lexis+ trial
**Trials are provided to all ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
* denotes a required field
Contracts for Difference (CfD) trackerThe aim of the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme is to provide long-term price stabilisation to low carbon plant and to enable investment to come forward at lower capital costs, which means lower costs for consumers, and is one of the key mechanisms used by
Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of
Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so
Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to
0330 161 1234