Arbitral Tribunal Definition

Case studies

"While we began looking at ��Ƶ products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available."

Co-Op

Access all documents on Arbitral Tribunal

GET ACCESS NOW

GLOSSARY

/ˈɑːbɪtr(ə)l/ /trʌɪˈbjuːn(ə)l,trɪˈbjuːn(ə)l/

Published by a ��Ƶ Arbitration expert

What does Arbitral Tribunal mean?

The arbitrator(s) appointed on or behalf of the parties to an arbitration to resolve their dispute. A tribunal may consist of a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators (generally, three).

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales) STOP PRESS: This Practice Note has been updated in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025 and contains reference to amended provisions in the Arbitration Act 1996. For further information on when the new act comes into force see Practice Note: When will the Arbitration Act 2025 come into force? This Practice Note considers the procedural law of arbitration proceedings and how it is determined under the law of England and Wales (England and English are used as convenient shorthand). The procedural law of the arbitral proceedings The procedural law of an arbitration is also called the 'lex arbitri' or the 'curial law'. It provides the framework for the internal procedure of the arbitration itself and the power of the courts supervising and supporting the arbitration. The detail of how an arbitration is to be proceeded is usually determined by any applicable arbitration rules, the procedural orders of the tribunal, and the parties' agreement. The curial law can,...

Interim measures in support of arbitration in Brazil

Interim measures in support of arbitration in Brazil Interim measures in Brazil are regulated by the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure (Federal Law No 13.105/2015 (BCCP)), which sets out various types of available interim measures, each of them applicable to specific reliefs sought, with a general purpose to ensure the effectiveness of a final decision, either judicial or arbitral. Also, the Brazilian Arbitration Act (BAA), which regulates arbitration in Brazil (Federal Law No 9307/96), provides that before the constitution of the arbitral tribunal the parties of the arbitration may request for interim measures before the courts. After the constitution of the arbitral tribunal, the BAA grants the arbitral tribunal the exclusive power to grant any request for interim measures and also maintain, modify or revoke the interim measures granted by the courts. The legal requirements for interim remedies are essentially the same in the context of arbitration or in judicial proceedings. As a consequence, the general legal landscape provided in the BCCP may serve as guidance for...

Discover our 7 Practice Notes on Arbitral Tribunal

ICC—Answer to Request for Arbitration

ICC—Answer to Request for Arbitration The Secretariat of the International Court of Arbitration International Chamber of Commerce [Address of an approved ICC office and by email to the relevant address for the office] [Date] Dear [ICC Secretariat], [Insert ICC Reference number] Answer to Request for Arbitration: [Party names] [Law firm case reference number] We confirm that we act on behalf of [name of respondent party], the Respondent party in the above arbitration proceedings. The Respondent received your letter dated [Insert date] plus enclosures including the request for arbitration (the Request) on [Insert ]. Pursuant to article 5 of the 2021 ICC Rules of Arbitration (ICC Rules), we enclose the Respondent’s answer to the request for arbitration and counterclaim (the Answer). [The Respondent requests, in accordance with art 5(3) of the ICC Rules, that the Secretariat transmits the Answer by delivery against receipt, registered post or courier. We enclose [number] copies.] Kindly acknowledge receipt of this Answer. Yours faithfully, [Name of Respondent's counsel] IN THE...

Response for an adjudication

Response for an adjudication IN THE MATTER OF THE housing grants, construction and regeneration act 1996 And IN THE MATTER OF AN ADJUDICATION BEFORE [Name of Adjudicator] Between [Name of party 1] The Referring Party and [Name of party 2] The Responding Party _______________________________________ RESPONSE _______________________________________ Introduction 1 This is the Responding Party’s Response to the Referring Party’s Referral Notice served on [date] (the Referral). 2 This Response is accompanied by a bundle, which includes the following materials: 2.1 chronology of relevant events at tab [insert] (Tab [insert]) 2.2 [insert] at tab [insert] (Tab [insert]) 2.3 [insert] at tab [insert] (Tab [insert]) 3 In this Response, references to the documents and materials accompanying the Notice of Adjudication and Referral are in the form used by the Referring Party. 4 This Response addresses the key issues in dispute. It does not respond to the Referral on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis, nor answer every allegation made in the Referral. For the avoidance of doubt, however, all allegations made by...

Dive into our 8 Precedents related to Arbitral Tribunal

How international arbitration could factor in tariff dispute resolution

Law360: With the Trump administration's emphasis on tariffs, including introducing tariffs against the U.S.' three biggest trading partners and advocating for an External Revenue Service to collect tariffs and other foreign revenue, members of the business world face increasing uncertainties as they assess and renegotiate the cost of doing business and obligations under a changed economic and political landscape, increasing the likelihood of contract disputes.[1]

France: clarifying the threshold for suspending annulment proceedings on state aid grounds (OMV v The Romanian Ministry of Environment)

Arbitration analysis: In a decision dated 25 March 2025, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled on the conditions under which annulment proceedings against an arbitral award may be stayed in light of a pending or anticipated assessment by the European Commission regarding the compatibility of said award with EU state aid rules. The ruling clarifies the burden of proof borne by parties invoking EU law-based objections to enforcement of arbitral awards. Written by Flore Poloni, partner & Kimberley Bazelais, associate at Signature Litigation.

Read the latest 2 News articles on Arbitral Tribunal

Top

Trial

��Ƶ

GLOSSARY