1.1 Permanent Establishment | Employer Of Record | Tolley's Global Mobility: Employment Taxes (Worldwide excluding Europe) | Tolley
Commentary

1.1 Permanent establishment

Employer of Record

There are number of potential tax implications that could arise through engaging the services of an EOR. These include:

  1. 鈥⑻� the creation of a permanent establishment (PE) in the country in which the employee is locally contracted (1.1)

  2. 鈥⑻� exposure to diverted profits tax (1.2)

  3. 鈥⑻� increased social security costs that can't be mitigated via a bilateral agreement (1.3)

  4. 鈥⑻� exposure to general anti-avoidance rules (1.4)

1.1听听听听 Permanent establishment

It is a common selling point from EORs that permanent establishment (PE) risk ceases to be a consideration for the business engaging an EOR (the 'company'). However, as always, things are rarely so simple.

Most countries have domestic rules that determine if a PE exists in their jurisdiction, creating a nexus for the imposition of local corporate tax. If there is a double tax treaty, then the rules in the agreement take precedence over domestic rules.

The OECD Model Tax Convention is adopted to a large extent by most countries, but it is important to note that domestic

To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to Tolley+™ Research or register for a free trial

Web page updated on 17 Mar 2025 15:38